🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. As time has passed, an observance that started out as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a corporate feel, expanding to include gatherings where individuals of African heritage are paid to speak with white audiences about hidden biases and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests sparked an increase in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Background of Black History Month

Initially celebrated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in the tenth month in the UK, Germany, Éire and the Netherlands.

The observance has transformed since those days, focusing less on the narratives of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the month is observed is a indication of the political moment. How it evolves is a good lesson in how assimilation leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Hardly anything shows how important it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the current time in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a legislator gains confidence to say that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the US, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the state. A drive to scrub African American heritage and experience from the archives is in progress. One of the political figure's first executive orders focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the month represents how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is confined to either obligatory business commemorations, or depoliticized commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the situation of the present. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. A university professor, a professor at University of Greenwich, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the celebration. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Figuring out how to adapt, revise and extend actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just eliminate events including Black History Month altogether, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an era that has failed to deliver.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – form an foundation that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed through the year (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not avoid politics, and provides room for people, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What value has basic knowledge of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Establishments who celebrate it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and awareness of “microaggressions”, but confronted with the dangers that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and responsive. Maybe an complete renaming is required – Black History is Now Month.